ICMR Case Studies and Management Resources

Asia's Largest Online Collection of Management Case Studies

Directory: Case Studies / Free Resources / Micro Case Studies / Business Ethics

Coal Mines In China: Putting Profits Before Safety?

<< Previous Email Alerts | Invite a Friend

The disaster at RZC was cited as yet another example of what was wrong with Chinese coal mines and raised some serious ethical questions.

It was reported that the RZC mine, which had a capacity of 210,000 tones of coal per annum, was allegedly producing double that figure.

In order to increase production, RZC was allegedly mining at depths well beyond the permitted "level two", in a blatant breach of regulations.

Moreover, on the day of the accident some 128 workers were working in underground mines as against the maximum permissible limit of 60 workers per shift.

Analysts felt that such breach of regulations was nothing new in Chinese coal mines, particularly in the winter when the mines ramp up production to meet the increased demand for coal.

In addition to accusations of endangering the lives of workers by compromising on process safety due to its high emphasis on cost cutting, RZC was heavily criticized for what unfolded after the disaster. It was alleged that the management did not report the disaster to the authorities for six hours in a bid to cover up the issue.

According to analysts, mine owners often did not report such accidents, fearing a closure of the mine. The management at RZC tried to rescue the workers trapped in the mine with the help of in-house and untrained staff rather than call for professional help.

Critics contended that this led to many more workers being killed in the accident. It was yet another example of Chinese mine owners putting the lives of their workers in jeopardy in their pursuit of profits, they said.

The Chinese government swung into action following the disaster. It suspended RZC's operating license and froze its bank accounts. It also took into custody 33 people including a manager of the mine. The owner of the mine was reportedly absconding.

The government offered to pay ¥215,000 as compensation to the victims and stated that it was taking measures to improve the working conditions of coal mines by issuing a 'five point' instruction that sought to enforce safety mechanisms in coal mines.

It also launched a safety campaign and assured the public that it would shut down all coal mines that disregard safety rules.

However, some analysts were skeptical about any significant improvements in the working conditions of the mine workers.

According to them, the government's efforts to improve safety conditions were often hampered by the increasing demand for coal in the booming Chinese economy.

Moreover, closing down of mines was not a feasible solution since plant closures resulted in methane accumulation causing huge explosions when these mines were reopened.

  Micro Case Studies Main Page Buy This Business Environment Case Study

Continued...

Email Alerts | Invite a Friend

Google