The case discusses the crisis faced by Coke in Europe when people fell ill after consuming its products. The case also brings out the ethical dimensions involved in Coke’s exclusive school contracts, which was done to promote soft drink sales among school children.
As part of a damage control exercise, Coke sent a team of scientists to Europe.
During its visit to Europe after a week of these incidents, Coke's chairman and
CEO Michael Douglas Ivester said, "We deeply regret any problems encountered by
our European consumers in the past few days." Coke Belgium even announced that
it would reimburse the medical costs for people who had become ill after
consuming its products.
The recall had a significant negative impact on Coke's financial performance
with its second-quarter net income coming down by 21% to $942 million. Moreover,
the entire operation cost Coke $103m (£66m) while its European bottling venture
showed a 5% fall in revenues.
Analysts felt that the Belgium recall was one of the worst public relations
problems in Coke's history. One analyst alleged that the company had information
about people who had become ill weeks prior to the above incidents. Coke had an
opportunity to disclose this information but it did not do so. He blamed Coke
for being unethical in not disclosing the information, "The instinct is to pull
information in, and that is almost always wrong.
The right move is to focus on the health of the customer. Even though you don't
think this information is relevant, you should get it out - because that allows
people who might think it is relevant to go through whatever process they want
to go through. Coke might have done a lot more than it did in the opening days
of the crisis." Another issue, which worried analysts, was the illness caused to
the innocent school children. They blamed Coke's promotion strategy to sell soft
drinks to school children which had raised lot of controversies in the US....
More...
BACKGROUND NOTE
EXCLUSIVE SCHOOL CONTRACTS
THE EXPLANATION
QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION
EXHIBIT I SEVEN CATEGORIES OF SCHOOLHOUSE COMMERCIALISM
EXHIBIT II HEALTH IMPACT OF SOFT DRINKS
EXHIBIT II HEALTH IMPACT OF SOFT DRINKS (CONTD.)
EXHIBIT III RISING CONSUMPTION OF SOFT DRINKS
ADDITIONAL READINGS AND REFERENCES
Case Code BECG014 Case Length 12 Pages Period 1999 - 2001 Organization Coke, Belgian Health Ministry, Pub Date 2002 Teaching Note Available Countries Belgium Industry Food & Beverages
Issues Unethical Practices in Companies
Keywords
Coke, Europe, consuming, products, school contracts, soft drink, sales, children, case Study, Business ethics
Please note:
This case study was
compiled from published sources, and is intended to be used as a basis for
class discussion. It is not intended to illustrate either effective or
ineffective handling of a management situation. Nor is it a primary
information source.
To download this case (No. BECG014 ) click on the button
below, and select the case from the list of available cases: