Abstract Hector Ruiz, Chief Executive Officer of Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) has strong reason to believe that AMD will give Intel a run for its money in the 64-bit microprocessor market. Itanium I, Intel's first 64-bit microprocessor has failed. Itanium II has also elicited a lukewarm response from the market. But Opteron, AMD's 64-bit microprocessor, released in mid-2003 is receiving strong performance reviews. Many companies that shied away from AMD's products in the past such as Hewlett Packard, Sun, IBM have started using Opteron. AMD has grabbed 7% of the low-end server market, up from almost nothing a few years back. Is AMD finally ready to catch up with Intel? The case covers the leadership of Ruiz, market response and features of Opteron and the battle between AMD and Intel. |
<<Previous Page
Opteron contd...
Though Opteron was designed for high-end servers it could also run like 32-bit
(Pentium and Athlon) processors in most PCs. A PC version of Opteron was also
expected to be available unlike Intel's Itanium 2. Opteron prices ranged from
$283 to $794, compared to Itanium 2's $1,338 to $4,226.
|
Opteron's design made it fully backward compatible with existing 32-bit
applications. That differentiated it from Itanium 2, which used a different
architecture.
By offering both 64-bit and 32-bit operation with the same chip, AMD believed
that Opteron systems would be the perfect upgrades for aging servers that used
Intel's Pentium and Xeon processors. AMD also had plans to introduce a 64-bit
processor for home computers in 2003. The Athlon 64, due for release in
September 2003, would be the first such chip aimed at the consumer market.
|
|
In early 2003, there were no 64-bit applications for consumers, but AMD
believed that once Athlon 64 machines were available, multimedia and game
software companies would write programs to take advantage of their power.
David vs Goliath
For more than 30 years, AMD had been challenging Intel in the semiconductor
industry. Intel had been able to control x86 microprocessor and PC system
standards and dictate the type of products the market required of competitors.
Intel's financial muscle allowed it to market its products aggressively, offer
special incentives and to wean away customers who did business with AMD. Intel
had longstanding partnerships with both software developers and hardware
manufacturers. Intel exerted substantial influence over PC manufacturers and
their distribution channels through the "Intel Inside" brand and other marketing
programs .
Intel spent substantially greater amounts on R&D than AMD did. For instance,
Intel was expected to generate revenues of $34 billion in 2004 with projected
profits of $7.35 billion. This meant Intel earned in 11 days what AMD made in a
year. In January 2005, Intel had a $14 billion cash reserve compared to AMD's
reserves of about $1.1 billion.
The microprocessor market was characterized by short product life cycles and
migration to ever-higher performance microprocessors. To compete successfully
against Intel, AMD realized the need to make the transition to new process
technologies at a rapid pace and offer higher-performance microprocessors in
significantly greater volumes.
Things had started looking up for AMD since the late 1990s. The Internet boom
had increased the appetite of consumers and businesses' for microprocessors. But
this time, Intel had finalized plans to make a paradigm shift in its
architecture by tying-up with HP to make the Itanium series of
microprocessors....
More...
New Optimism
A New Leader
Looking Forward
Exhibit: 1 AMD's Stock (January 2000 - January 2005)
Exhibit: 2 AMD Product Roadmap
Exhibit: 3 Opteron Features
Exhibit: 4 AMD - Timeline of Important Events
Exhibit: 5 AMD - Key Financials
Bibliography
|