Abstract Maruti Udyog Limited, India''s largest car manufacturer is a joint venture between Suzuki Motors of Japan and the Indian government. The financial statements of the company are prepared in accordance with the Indian generally accepted accounting policies. The case discusses Maruti Udyog''s accounting policies with special reference to revenue recognition, depreciation, inventory, investments, foreign currency transactions and deferred taxation. |
<<Previous Page
Background Note contd...
In 1985, another utility vehicle Gypsy, designed for tough road
conditions, was launched. In the late 1980s, Suzuki increased its equity stake
in Maruti from 26% to 40% and further to 50% in 1992. This converted Maruti
into a non-government company and gave Suzuki a much freer hand in managing
the affairs of the company.
|
In 1990, Maruti introduced a 3-box car, Maruti 1000. In
1993, it introduced a new model, the Zen with a 1300 cc engine, and Esteem, a
variation of Maruti 1000 (which was replaced) with more power and a new
exterior. In the same year, the first sign of conflict between the joint
venture partners surfaced, when Suzuki proposed a Rs.22 billion expansion and
modernization plan. The transfer of gearbox technology was also a bone of
contention between the two partners. The government felt that Suzuki was
deliberately withholding this technology so that it could export it to Maruti
and make windfall profits at the cost of Maruti.
|
|
However, in mid-1996, the government approved the plan and
Suzuki agreed to transfer its technology. Meanwhile, in 1994, Maruti had
become the first Indian company to reach a cumulative production of one
million vehicles. In 1995, Maruti received ISO 9002 certification. In 1997,
Maruti crossed the two million mark in cumulative vehicle production. In
1997-98, Maruti's overall market share was 83.1%.
In 1997, Suzuki and the government again faced a series of disputes over
management control and the appointment of Bhargava's successor. It was
Bhargava who had played a significant role in getting Maruti up and running.
Bhargava had also managed the relations between Suzuki and the government
well. When the government announced R.S.S.L.N. Bhaskarudu would succeed
Bhargava, Suzuki claimed that the appointment was illegal since a majority
(five out of nine) of the board members had objected. Suzuki even alleged that
Bhaskarudu was incompetent and unsuitable for the post of MD. Later, the two
partners decided to settle their differences amicably. Bhaskarudu indicated he
would step down two years ahead of schedule, and Jagdish Khattar would replace
him in January 2000.
More...
Exhibit: I Maruti: Major Brands
Exhibit: II Maruti: Revenue
Exhibit: III Maruti: Fixed Assets
Exhibit: IV Maruti: Plant and Machinery
Exhibit: V Maruti: Inventories
Exhibit: VI Maruti: Investments
Exhibit: VII Maruti: Foreign Exchange Transactions
Bibliography
|