|
THE OUTSOURCING WAR:
LET ECONOMICS TRIUMPH OVER POLITICS
<<Previous
In an article, "Why Your Job Isn't Moving to Bangalore" in
the New York Times, Jagdish Bhagwati, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign
Relations and professor at Columbia University writes that the panic and furor
over outsourcing is completely unwarranted. He further says that no jobs are
being taken away from America. He says that the affect of changes in technology
is being felt in the labor intensive industries. According to him, the loss of
jobs in the US is due to technological changes.
Professor Bhagwati is also critical about politicizing the whole issue. He says
that outsourcing will strengthen the competitiveness of the US companies. Firms
ignoring the cheaper supplies would lose out. Professor Bhagwati further says
that outsourcing service jobs is nothing different from importing of
labor-intensive textiles and other goods. According to him, all empirical
studies in the US over the last two decades suggest that wage stagnation in the
manufacturing industry is more due to automation of the processes, not the
cheaper imports. The same is applicable to service industry as well.
Jane Linder of Accenture's Institute for Strategic Change says that companies
outsourcing the traditional back-office work have more control and discipline
over their operations. Moreover, employees of the company can concentrate on
framing strategies. Further, outsourcing also results in greater efficiency and
lowering costs. This allows companies to offer better services to customers. A
study done by McKinsey Global Institute reveals that for every dollar of work
outsourced by the US, it gets back $1.14 as income, and the countries to which
the work is being outsourced gains 35 cents. This shows that outsourcing is a
win-win situation for both the countries.
|
Benefit per $1 of US spending on outsourcing ,
2002 est. |
| Benefits for US |
Benefits for India |
|
Savings to US investors or customers
|
0.58
|
Labor
|
0.1
|
|
Imports of US goods and services by providers in India
|
0.05
|
Profits retained in India
|
0.1
|
|
Transfer of profits by US based providers in India back to
US
|
0.04
|
Suppliers
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net direct benefit retained in US
|
0.67
|
Central government taxes
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value for US labor reemployed
|
0.45-0.47
|
State government taxes
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential net benefit for US
|
1.12-1.14
|
Net benefit to India
|
0.33
|
| Source: Mckinsey Global Institute |
More >>
2005, ICMR Case Studies and Management Resources. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be
reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, used in a spreadsheet, or transmitted
in any form or by any means - electronic or mechanical, without permission.
|