JP Morgan Chase (JP), the second largest financial services company in the US, is exposed to credit risk through its lending, trading and capital market activities. JP''s credit risk management practices are designed to preserve the independence and integrity of the risk assessment process. JP has taken various steps to ensure that credit risks are adequately assessed, monitored and managed. In early 2003, JP has combined its Credit Risk Policy and Global Credit Management functions to form Global Credit Risk Management consisting of the five primary functions - Credit Risk Management, Credit Portfolio Group, Policy & Strategic Group, Special Credits Group and Chase Financial Services (CFS) Consumer Credit Management Risk.
INTRODUCTION
JP Morgan Chase (JP) was exposed to credit risk through its lending, trading and capital market activities. JP's credit risk management (CRM) practices were designed to preserve the independence and integrity of the risk assessment process. JP had taken various steps to ensure that credit risks were adequately assessed, monitored and managed.
In early 2003, the Credit Risk Policy and Global Credit Management functions were combined to form Global CRM consisting of the five primary functions - Credit Risk Management, Credit Portfolio Group, Policy & Strategic Group, Special Credits Group and Chase Financial Services (CFS) Consumer Credit Management Risk.
Business Strategy & Risk Management
Commercial
JP's business strategy for its large corporate commercial portfolio remained primarily one of origination for distribution. Bulk of the wholesale loan originations were distributed into the marketplace. Residual holds averaged less than 10%. The commercial loan portfolio declined by 9% in 2003, due to a combination of continued weak loan demand, ongoing goal of reducing commercial credit concentrations and refinancings into more liquid capital markets.
To measure commercial credit risk, JP estimated the likelihood of default; the amount of exposure in case of default and the loss severity given a default event. Based on these factors and related market-based inputs, JP estimated both expected and unexpected losses for each segment of the portfolio. Expected losses were statistically based estimates of credit losses over time. They were used to set risk-adjusted credit loss provisions. Such losses could be factored into the pricing and covered as a normal and recurring cost of doing business. Unexpected losses represented the potential volatility of actual losses relative to the expected level of losses and formed the basis for the credit risk capital-allocation process.
Case Code FINA003 Case Length 22 Pages Period 2002 - 2003 Organization JP Morgan Chase Pub Date 2005 Teaching Note Not Available Countries USA Industry Banking
This case study was
compiled from published sources, and is intended to be used as a basis for
class discussion. It is not intended to illustrate either effective or
ineffective handling of a management situation. Nor is it a primary
information source.
To
download this case (No. FINA003 ) click on the
button below, and select the case from the list of available cases: