Search for Cases

Case Details

Case Code: FINC124
Case Length: 14 Pages 
Period: 2017- 2018    
Pub Date: 2017
Teaching Note: Available
Price:Rs.500
Organization : Snap, Inc.
Industry : Technology; Social media
Countries : US
Themes: Financial Management/Corporate Governance  
Case Studies  
Business Strategy
Marketing
Finance
Human Resource Management
IT and Systems
Operations
Economics
Leadership & Entrepreneurship

Snap, Inc.'s IPO and the Corporate Governance Controversy

 

ABSTRACT

 
This case is about Snap, Inc., the six-year-old US-based technology and social media company which was in the midst of a controversy on account of its of non-voting shares. In 2017, Snap became the first company ever to go public with a structure that denied outside shareholders any voice in the company. The company concentrated control in the hands of its co-founders through the multi-class stock structure. The absence of voting rights in Snap’s IPO raised concerns among institutional investors and asset managers, who considered the move as an impediment to corporate governance and transparency. Snap mentioned the risk factor in its IPO filing and said that the co-founders would have control over all stockholder decisions because they controlled a substantial majority of the company’s voting stock. Meanwhile, corporate governance experts advised potential investors to avoid Snap because of the voting rights issue and lack of accountability on the part of the company. Going forward, Snap admitted that it may never make money and had no intention of paying cash dividends to its shareholders in the foreseeable future. However, despite the multi-class stock structure with no voting rights to its shareholders, Snap’s IPO was successful. Even as Snap’s co-founders readied an aggressive growth plan to become the biggest new publicly traded tech company, analysts questioned whether it was possible for the company to achieve this feat with poor corporate governance.
 
Finance Case Studies | Case Study in Management, Operations, Strategies, Business Environment, Case Studies
or
Finance Case Studies | Case Study in Management, Operations, Strategies, Business Environment, Case Studies
or
PayPal (11 USD)

 

Issues

The case is structured to achieve the following teaching objectives:
  • Understand the multi-class stock structure of Snap.
  • Analyze how Snap’s non-voting shares raise governance issues at the company.
  • Understand the possible advantages and disadvantages of non-voting shares for Snap
  • Discuss and debate whether Snap can maintain its high valuation with the current governance structure
Contents
INTRODUCTION
BACKGROUND NOTE
THREE-TIER VOTING STRUCTURE
GOVERNANCE ISSUES
IPO VALUATION
SUPPORT FOR SNAP’S NON-VOTING SHARES
CHALLENGES
THE ROAD AHEAD
EXHIBITS

Keywords

Initial Public Offer; IPO filing; Equity capital market; Valuation; Managerial Economics; Prospects theory; Governance; Corporate governance structure; Share offering; Multi-class stock structure; Dual-class structure; Three-tier share structure; Non-voting shares; Zero voting rights; Super-voting shares

INTRODUCTION - Next Page>>