The Procter & Gamble (P&G)-Gillette Merger |
ICMR HOME | Case Studies Collection
» Business Strategy Case Studies » ICMR Case Study Collection » ICMR Home » View Detailed Pricing Info » How To Order This Case » Business Case Studies
Please note: This case study was compiled from published sources, and is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion. It is not intended to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management situation. Nor is it a primary information source.
|
||||||||||
ExcerptsBackground NoteP&G
The Consumer Goods Industry in the Early 2000sThe consumer goods industry grew rapidly from the 1950s through the 1990s, thanks to the launch of new products from frozen foods to disposable diapers. It was a period of growing population and increasing disposable incomes. Products were marketed based on the concept of mass marketing. However, in the early 2000s, slow sales growth, increasing costs of inputs, emergence of private labels, lower margins, difficult price negotiations, and increasing diversity of channels, choices, and consumer types posed new challenges for this $ 2 trillion plus industry...
According to marketing guru, Al Ries, "The extra 18% premium paid by P&G for Gillette's stock is going to make it 18% more difficult for the deal to pay dividends to stock holders." P&G would have to borrow funds to finance the planned repurchase of its stock. In light of this move, credit rating agencies put both companies under a review for a possible downgrade. S&P placed all ratings for P&G on Credit Watch with negative implications based on the likelihood that P&G's leverage would increase significantly due to the merger. As of September 30, 2004, P&G had debts of $21.4 billion and Gillette of $3.1 billion...
|
Case Studies Links:-
Case Studies,
Mini Case Studies,
Micro Case Studies,
Simplified Case Studies.
Other Case Studies:-
Multimedia Case Studies,
Cases in Other Languages.
Business Reports Link:-
Business Reports.
Books:-
Text Books,
Work Books,
Case Study Volumes.