Add to Favorites | Free Email Alerts | Invite a Friend | Contact Us

Case Studies and Management Resources

Asia's Most Popular Collection of Management Case Studies

Case Studies | Case Study in Business, Management
Google

Register for the IBSAT 2008 Bulletin & Application Form
Click Here

Onjus - Squeezed Out

"Onjus is to 100% fruit drinks what Cadbury's is to chocolates and Fevicol to adhesives."

- Jagdeep Kapoor, Managing Director, Samsika Marketing Consultants, Ad agency of ETL.

"Orange juice is the most popular natural drink all over the world. In India, there was no such product, although there was an acceptance of orange juice in the form of concentrates and soft drinks."

- Tulsidas Goyal, Managing Director, ETL.

Introduction

In May 1997, Onjus, a 100% orange juice was launched by Enkay Texofood Ltd. (ETL)1 in the niche market of fruit juices and virtually created a new product category.

By 1999, Onjus gained a 19% share (Refer Table II) in the tetra-pack fruit beverages market (Refer Exhibits I and II). However, the success of Onjus seemed to be short lived.

In 1999, the Director General of Investigation and Registration (DGIR)2 lodged a complaint with the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission (MRTPC),3 against Onjus being sold as a natural fruit juice.

As a result, Onjus was not sold in the market for sometime.

Onjus - Squeezed Out - Next Page >>>


1] ETL was involved in two businesses – Textiles and Fruit Processing

2] The DGIR functioned in terms of Section 8 of the MRTP Act, with effect from the 1st August, 1984, for making
investigations for the purpose of the Act, for maintaining a register of agreements subject to registration under the
Act and also for performing such other functions assigned to DGIR under the act.

3] The MRTP Act was originally framed to prevent concentration of economic power and to prohibit monopolistic and
restrictive practices. The Act was amended in 1984, based on the recommendations of the Rajendra Sachar
Committee, to provide also for the prohibition of unfair trade practices. The Act was further amended in 1991 virtually
making the word 'monopolies' in the nomenclature of the Commission superfluous by de-emphasizing its role in
controlling monopolies. The 1991 amendment eliminated the pre-restrictions of seeking government's approval of
companies and undertaking with assets of more than Rs.1 billion for setting up new ventures or expansion of existing units. Since then the role of the Commission was confined to deal with complaints against undertakings relating to adoption of monopolistic,
restrictive and unfair trade practices. The SVS Raghavan Committee on Competition Policy and Law has
recommended enactment of an Indian Competition Act, alongwith the setting up of a Competition Commission of
India (CCI), repeal of the MRTP Act, 1969, and the winding up of the MRTP Commission.

Case Details

Case Code : BSTR011
Themes: Brand Management
Case Length : 9 Pages
Period : 1997-2001
Organization : Enkay Texofood Ltd
Pub Date : 2002
Teaching Note : Available
Countries : India
Industry : Food, Beverages and Tobacco

Free Case Studies

Business Strategy
Finance
HRM
Insurance
IT and Systems
Marketing
Operations
Leadership
More Case Studies >>

Micro Case Studies

Business Environment
Business Ethics
Business Strategy
Human Resource Management
IT and Systems
Marketing
Operations
Micro Case Studies >>

Free Resources

Micro Case Studies
Case Studies
Articles
Interviews
Book Reviews
Glossary
Online Quiz
More Free Resources >>

Case Related Links

Best Selling Case Studies
Business Case Studies
Learning With Case Studies
Case Studies Catalogue
Cases Used in Textbooks
Prize Winning Case Studies
Case Studies Search
Business Updates
More Case Studies >>