| The Adidas - Reebok Merger |  | ICMR HOME | Case Studies CollectionOR
 Case Details:
 
 Case Code : BSTR177
 Case Length : 21 Pages
 Pages Period : 1997-2005
 Organization : Vltas Ltd.
 Pub Date : 2005
 Teaching Note :Not Available
 Countries : US, Germany
 Industry : Footwear and Apparel
 
 To download The Adidas - Reebok Merger  case study (Case Code: 
BSTR177) click on the button  below, and select the case from the list of available cases:
 
 
  
 
 
	Price:
		| 
 Buy With PayPal
 |  
 For delivery in electronic format: Rs. 400;
 For delivery through courier (within India): Rs. 400 + Shipping & Handling Charges extra
 
 » Business Strategy Case Studies
 » Case Studies Collection
 » Business Strategy Short Case Studies
 » View Detailed Pricing Info
 » How To Order This Case
 » Business Case Studies
 » Case Studies by Area
 » Case Studies by Industry
 » Case Studies by Company
 » Business Case Studies
 » Case Studies by Area
 » Case Studies by Industry
 » Case Studies by Company
 
 
     
 Please note:
 
 This case study was compiled from published sources, and is intended to be US, Germanyed as a basis for class discUS, Germanysion. It is not intended to illUS, Germanytrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management situation. Nor is it a primary information source.
 | 
		
| 
	       
 << Previous
 EXCERPTS Contd...Integration IssuesAdidas said the companies would grow as a combined entity but 
would retain separate management. The companies also ruled out any workforce 
reductions.  
	
		| 
The new entity would continue to have separate headquarters and their individual 
sales forces. The companies would also keep most of the distribution centers independent and would have separate advertising programs for their brands.  Hainer said, "The brands will be kept separate because each brand has a lot of value and it would be stupid to bring them together. 
 The companies would continue selling products under respective brand names and labels."  Adidas declared that the deal would involve investment in both Adidas and Reebok. These investments would guide the companies towards effective consolidation.
 |   
 |  The Track Ahead
	
		| Analysts had varied opinions about the deal. Some analysts felt that Adidas could beat Nike to become the industry leader. Al Ries said that, "The biggest benefit is that it removes a competitor. Now, all they need to do is to focus all their efforts on competing with Nike."  However, a few analysts opined that it was impossible to dislodge Nike from its No. 1 position.  
		
 Nike was a preferred brand because of its fashion status, colors, and combinations. Although Adidas was perceived to have good quality products that offered comfort and Reebok was perceived as a 'cool' brand, Nike was perceived as having both 'hipness' and quality...
 |  |  Exhibits
Exhibit I: Share Price Movement of Adidas-Salomon AG, August 2005Exhibit II: The Three Stipes Logo of Adidas
 Exhibit III: Product Profile of Adidas-Salomon AG
 Exhibit IV: Financial Summary of Adidas
 Exhibit V: Financial Summary of Reebok
 Exhibit VI: Product profile of Reebok International Limited
 Exhibit VII: Corporate Mission of Adidas
 Exhibit VIII: Financial Summary of Nike
 Exhibit IX: Top Sponsorship Deals of Adidas, Reebok and Nike
 Exhibit X: The Swoosh Logo of Nike
 
 |