FREE TRADE VS. PROTECTIONISM
Which Way for the US Steel Industry?
<<Previous
SECTION 201 TARIFF MEASURES LIFTED
In December 2003, the president lifted the tariffs and thus
avoided a trade war with the EU and Asian countries. Announcing the lifting of
the tariffs, the president said, "I took action to give the industry a chance to
adjust to the surge in foreign imports and to give relief to the workers and
communities that depend on steel for their jobs and livelihoods. The safeguard
measures have now achieved their purpose, and as a result of changed economic
circumstances, it is time to lift them." The Bush administration was of the
opinion that since March 2002 when the tariff measures were imposed, the
industry has consolidated and improved productivity, thus it was time to lift
the tariffs. However, the president in his statement said that he would continue
to monitor the imports closely to detect any destabilizing surges of cheap
foreign steel. He also said that negotiations with U.S's trading partners to
reduce government intervention such as subsidies would continue through the
OECD.
The Bush administration seemed to have realized that trade is quid pro quo…
EXHIBIT I
Imports of Steel in to The Us

Adapted from The American Steel Industry Current Trade Issues 2003, www.dbtrade.com/publications.
More >>
[21]Bush lifts tariffs on imported steel, EU
drops plan to retaliate; U.S. steelmakers criticize, New York Times,
December 4, 2003.
[22]President's Statement on Steel, December 4, 2003, www.whitehouse.goc/news/releases.
2010, ICMR (IBS Center for Management Research).All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be
reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, used in a spreadsheet, or transmitted
in any form or by any means - electronic or mechanical, without permission.
|