Knowledge Management Initiatives at British Petroleum
Abstract
The case discusses the various knowledge management (KM) initiatives undertaken by the UK- based oil and gas exploration major British Petroleum Plc. (BP) in the 1990s. It describes in detail the Virtual Teamwork project started in late 1994; the Knowledge Management team established in 1997; and the application of KM tools for reducing the emission of harmful gases like carbon dioxide and methane in the late 1990s. The case also describes the various KM tools used by BP including Peer Assist, BP Connect, After Action Review and Retrospect. The benefits reaped by BP through the above KM initiatives and the challenges faced during the implementation process are discussed.
"The wonderful thing about knowledge is that it is relatively inexpensive to replicate if you can capture it. Most activities or tasks are not onetime events. Whether it's drilling a well or conducting a transaction at a service station, we do the same things repeatedly. Our philosophy is fairly simple: Every time we do something again, we should do it better than the last time."
- John Browne, CEO, British Petroleum.
"The biggest single source of sustainable competitive advantage in the future will be our ability to create and mobilize knowledge in the interest of new products and services."
- Kent Greenes, Knowledge Management Team Leader, BP Amoco.
INTRODUCTION
By the end of 2001, the UK-based British Petroleum Plc (BP) had successfully implemented the emission trading system (ETS) in all units of the company. The ETS enabled BP to reduce the harmful emission of two gases - carbon dioxide and methane - in a cost-effective way. The company used advanced knowledge management (KM) applications such as internal electronic markets (IEM). By March 2002, due to ETS,
BP could reduce the quantum of emissions from all its business units by 10%.
Analysts were quick to comment that BP had once again successfully used KM to reduce costs and enhance the productivity and efficiency of its business operations.
In December 1994, BP launched the Virtual Teamwork Project (VTP), its first major knowledge management (KM) initiative. Later the company launched a series of KM initiatives, which yielded excellent financial results for its business operations. Following the successful implementation of VTP, BP launched various KM tools such as Peer Assist, After Action Review, BP Connect, Retrospect and Human portal. BP became one of the first few companies to treat KM as a separate discipline when it established a Knowledge Management Team (KMT) in 1997. "
Analysts felt that one of the main reasons for the success of
BP's KM initiatives was the enthusiasm displayed by the employees in knowledge
sharing and in applying various KM tools in their work. Commenting on the
significance of BP's KM initiatives, David Negal, the head of BP's gas unit in
Egypt, said, "The model here (at BP) is an open market of ideas and people
develop a sense of where the real expertise lies. Rather than having to deal with the bureaucracy of going through the center, you can just cut across to somebody in Stavanger [Norway] or Aberdeen [Scotland] or Houston and say, 'I need some help. Can you give me a couple of hours?' And that is expected and encouraged."
THE VIRTUAL TEAM WORK PROJECT
BP, which was founded in 1909 as the Anglo-Persian Oil
Company in Iran, had emerged as one of the leading oil exploration companies in
the world. Its primary activities included exploration and production, and
refining and marketing of oil and gas (through its network of subsidiaries
engaged in the chemical, exploration, gas, power and solar industries).
Case Code ITSY026 Case Length 11 Pages Period 1994 – 2002 Organization British Petroleum Pub Date 2003 Teaching Note Not Available Countries UK Industry Petroleum
Issues
• To understand the KM tools and techniques adopted by a company successful in its KM initiatives.
Keywords
Knowledge management, KM, UK, based, oil and gas, exploration, British Petroleum Plc., BP, 1990, Virtual Teamwork, 1994, 1997, KM tools, emission, carbon dioxide, methane, 1990, Peer Assist, BP Connect, After Action Review, Retrospect.
Please note:
This case study was
compiled from published sources, and is intended to be used as a basis for
class discussion. It is not intended to illustrate either effective or
ineffective handling of a management situation. Nor is it a primary
information source.
To download this case (No. ITSY026)
click on the button below, and select the case from the list of available cases: