NEW YORK
STOCK EXCHANGE
<< PREVIOUS
REGULATING THE REGULATOR
GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE AT NYSE
NYSE's governance structure comprised of five important
elements: Board of Directors (BoD), standing and advisory committees, a
nominating committee, professional executive management and not-for-profit
status.
BoD & Standing and Advisory committees
|
The 1366 broker-dealer members
of the exchange elected the BoD which consisted of 27 members (12 -
industry directors, 12 - non industry directors and 3 members of the
office of the chairman)[1] . No director was allowed to be on the board
for more than three consecutive two-year terms. The NYSE constitution
defined industry director as " (1) an individual member, (2) an individual
who is a principal executive, general partner or control person of a
member organization, or (3) a principal executive of an organization whose
"principal" subsidiary is a member organization."[2] The day-to-day
working of the exchange was overseen by the board. The board played an
active role in formulating policies and programs governing the working of
the exchange. Further NYSE constituted various standing and advisory
committees which comprised of NYSE directors for regulating the
functioning of NYSE. . |
|
The exchange had five standing
committees, ten advisory committees and four international advisory committees.
Nominating Committee
The nominating committee consisted of
eight members - four from industry category and four from non-industry category.
The members of the nominating committee were elected for two years and no member
could be re-elected for the second consecutive term. The nominating committee
nominated members to be elected to the BoD.
Professional Management
Though till 1970s, members of the exchange oversaw
the day-to-day functioning of the exchange, from early 1970s, a professional
management team was appointed by the Chairman and CEO with the approval from the
board to oversee the administrative matters. But executive vice-president was
directly elected by the board.
Not-for-Profit Status
Initially NYSE was a formed as
membership organization and in 1971 it was incorporated under Not-for-profit
Corporation Act. The main aim of the exchange was to maximize the reliability
and integrity of market functioning rather than to maximize profits.
NYSE COMES UNDER A FLAK
Over the years, governance at NYSE attracted lot of criticism. Analysts pointed
out that the governance structure at NYSE failed to deliver results. They felt
that NYSE failed to safeguard the interest of the general public. NYSE attracted
criticism due to the alleged misgovernance, and the role of specialists. However
the controversy regarding the CEO compensation received the wrath of the media
and general public the most.
Analysts opined that while NYSE demanded greater transparency in the operations
of the companies it regulated, it never bothered to bring in transparency in its
working processes. It was alleged that the process of electing the NYSE board
was not transparent and the Chairman handpicked the board. Though the exchange
claimed that its election process was fair and transparent, analysts pointed out
that the candidates to be elected to the board were nominated by the nominating
committee, which itself was regulated by the chairman and members themselves.
In early 2003, with increasing criticism against the working of stock markets,
Donaldson asked all the regulatory bodies and exchanges to review their
governance processes. NYSE requested CII to prepare a report on the governance
practices at NYSE. In August 2003, CII submitted a 47page report on the
governance practices at NYSE. The CII in its report said, "The exchange's public
purpose is to protect investors - but it is owned and operated by a profession
that has its own needs to tend to. The big banks - the so-called broker-dealers
- are not the only groups with interests to be considered, yet they wield
massive influence over the NYSE."
MORE >>
THE ROLE OF SPECIALISTS
THE CLEAN UP EXERCISE
© Icfai Press. Global CEO •
December 2003, All Rights
Reserved.
|