Escorts: Yamaha Motors Break-up
Details
Case Code:
CLBS029
Case Length:
4
Period:
Pub Date:
2004
Teaching Note:
NO
Price (Rs):
0
Organization:
Yamaha Motor Escorts Ltd.
Industry:
Automotive
Country:
India
Themes:
Market Entry ,Growth Strategy, Strategic Alliances
Abstract
The caselet traces the various developments from the time the joint venture took place till the breakup in 2000. In 1995, Escorts and Yamaha Motors formed a 50:50 joint venture (EYML). However, in mid 2000, Escorts divested 24% equity to Yamaha Motors and as a result, Yamaha Motors became a majority stakeholder in the venture (74:26).
Learning Objectives
The case is structured to achieve the following Learning Objectives:
- Why Escorts pulled out of the joint venture and how this move is going to affect Yamaha Motors
- and Escorts’ new business initiatives and how the company is placed to succeed in new economy businesses.
Contents
Escorts-Yamaha Motors Break-Up
In 1985, Yamaha Motor Company (Yamaha Motors) entered into a technical support
agreement with Escorts Limited (Escorts), and started local production of Yamaha
motorcycles. In 1995, Yamaha and Escorts signed another contract, establishing
Escorts Yamaha Motor Ltd. (EYML) to manufacture and market motorcycles in
India. Each company invested 50% of the capital for the Indian motorcycle venture.
The joint venture manufactured Rajdoot motorcycles at Faridabad and the RX and
four-stroke YBX series at Surajpur. EYML had the largest countrywide network of
over 500 dealers, supported by a wide base of sales & service outlets and spare parts
stockists. Anil Nanda, chairman, EYML, said the Surajpur and Faridabad facilities
would be modernized and upgraded with a Rs. 3.75 billion budget. With the
additional investments, volumes were expected to go up from 300,000 units in 1996
to 500,000 units by the year 2000. Sales turnover too was projected to rise from Rs. 9
billion, (including exports of Rs. 1.2 billion) to Rs. 20 billion (including exports of
Rs. 3 billion) over the same period.
In 1999, EYML closed down its moped manufacturing facility and discontinued
production of its two existing brands due to lack of adequate demand. The company
decided to concentrate fully on its motorcycle production. Company sources said that
EYML decided to discontinue the production as earning was low from moped
business. Against a 5% growth recorded by the moped segment in 1998-99, sales of
EYML mopeds declined by 17.7%. Its market share also declined from 1.9% in 1997-
98 to 1.5% in 1998-99.
In April 2000, Escorts announced that it was likely to sell around 20% stake in
EYML to Yamaha Motors. On April 24, 2000, Rajan Nanda, Chairman of Escorts,
the flagship of the Rs. 35 billion Escorts group held board meeting of Escorts Limited
(Escorts). At the meeting, Nanda informed the directors that, subject to the board’s
approval, Yamaha Motors could be given a majority stake in the joint venture
company. The Japanese two-wheeler major had offered to buy an additional 24%
stake in EYML from Escorts at Rs. 200 per share. The deal would add Rs. 2.3 billion
to Escorts’ coffers. The announcement seemed to have been well accepted by the
board. In late April 2000, the board of Escorts approved the proposal to divest 24%
equity.
For the Escorts board, such announcements were not new. In a little over a year,
Escorts had offloaded substantial chunks of its equity in three joint ventures to its
overseas partners. It all started in 1999 when Escorts sold one-third of its shares in the
construction equipment company Escorts JCB to JCB of the United Kingdom for Rs.
490 billion. This brought its stake down from 60% to 40%. Next came the turn of
Hughes Escorts Communication, a 51:49 joint venture between Hughes
Communications of the United States and Escorts. In December 1999, Escorts
offloaded 23% of its stake to Hughes for Rs. 750 million. This brought its
shareholding in the company to 26%. Escorts would thus become a minority
shareholder in EYML. However, an official said that Escorts’ holding in the joint
venture would not be less than 26% and it would not exit from the joint venture. Said
Nanda, “I have no intentions of selling off the entire stake to Yamaha. Escorts will
retain the 26 per cent stake we now hold in the venture.” With the change in the
equity pattern, Yamaha Motors would control the management of the joint venture.
Commented Nanda, “We have always believed that business relationships are driven
by the value added by each partner. We have decided that it would be appropriate for
Yamaha Motors, as the technology provider, to take the lead role in the business.”
This was the second such exercise undertaken by Nanda since 1995 when he took
over the reins of the company from his father, Har Prashad Nanda as chairman of the
group. Nanda identified four thrust areas for Escorts-agri-business, telecom, software
and healthcare. The idea behind giving Yamaha Motors the majority stake in the joint
venture was to focus more on the four thrust areas. Escorts would now concentrate on agri-business, telecom and healthcare. Escorts’ exit from the joint venture seemed to
be a well-planned move. The group had already moved out of businesses where it
believed it did not have a sustainable advantage.
Escorts would now focus on four core businesses: agribusiness (tractors), telecom
services (cellular telephony), IT and Internet services and healthcare services (cardiac
healthcare). However analysts were skeptical about Escorts’ success in these areas.
One analyst said, “It’s been almost 12-18 months since it identified these as core
businesses, and Escorts is still grappling with the new economy initiatives.” Escorts
was planning to acquire a controlling stake in at least two circles – Madhya Pradesh
and Gujarat. Escotel Mobile Communications, a 50:50 joint venture between Escorts
and First Pacific of Hongkong, had earlier lost out on two acquisitions to Skycell in
Chennai and Essar Cellphone in Delhi, as its bids were too low.
In May 2000, EYML was renamed Yamaha Motors Escorts Ltd (YMEL) following
Escorts decision to sell off 24% stake. In May 2001, Yamaha Motors struck a deal
with Escorts for acquiring the latter’s 26% shareholding in YMEL for Rs. 700
million. The deal marked Escort’s exit from the joint venture. Yamaha Motors would
now hold 100% stake in the company.
With the change in management, Yamaha Motors was expected to build global
capabilities, bring in new technology and offer a wide range of cost effective quality
products. All this was expected to give them an edge over competitors. The company
would also have the additional benefit of enlarging its scale of operations for
manufacturing and supplying products worldwide. On its part, Escorts would
continue to provide a stronger base for manufacturing facilities, a countrywide
dealership network and skilled manpower.
Yamaha Motors was also working to regain its lost market position. From being
number two in 1996, it had slipped to the fourth position in 2001. In December 2000,
Yamaha Motors launched Crux-a four-stroke bike. By mid 2001, Crux had already
sold 33,000 units. In December 2001, Yamaha Motors had a 14% share in the Indian
market which improved marginally in March 2002, to 15%. As a part of marketing
strategy, the company planned to introduce one new model each year and was
working on one such model.
Questions for Discussion
1. Both Escorts Motors and Yamaha Motors entered into a joint venture to
manufacture and market motorcycles in India. What was the rationale behind this
joint venture and what synergies were expected out of this joint venture?
2. In May 2000, Escorts took the decision to sell off 24% stake. In May 2001,
Yamaha Motors struck a deal with Escorts for acquiring the latter’s 26%
shareholding in YMEL for Rs. 700 million. The deal marked Escort’s exit from
the joint venture. Why do you think Escorts exited from the joint venture?
Keywords
Joint venture, flagship, acquisitions, shareholder, Escorts-Yamaha Motors
Related Case Studies
| Case Title | Details |
|---|---|
|
Case Title IBM in 2004: The Linux OptionCase Code: BSTA110 |
Details |
|
Case Title Oracle’s PeopleSoft Bid (Part C)Case Code: BSTA106 |
Details |
|
Case Title Oracle’s PeopleSoft Bid (Part B)Case Code: BSTA105 |
Details |
|
Case Title Oracle’s PeopleSoft Bid (Part A)Case Code: BSTA104 |
Details |
|
Case Title Ispat: Sidbec: Entering North AmericaCase Code: BSTA006 |
Details |