The Fall of Daewoo Motors
Details
Case Code:
CLBS030
Case Length:
4
Period:
Pub Date:
2004
Teaching Note:
NO
Price (Rs):
0
Organization:
Daewoo Motors
Industry:
Automotive
Country:
South Korea
Themes:
Corporate Strategy,Global Strategy, Market Analysis
Abstract
The caselet examines the problems faced by South Korea-based Daewoo Motors, the flagship company of the Daewoo Group. Daewoo Motors expanded rapidly in several risky and uncertain markets by taking huge debts.
Learning Objectives
The case is structured to achieve the following Learning Objectives:
- The major flaws in Daewoo’s expansion strategy and their consequences
- and Impact of the international expansion strategy on the Daewoo Group and Daewoo Motors’ financial performance
Contents
The Fall of Daewoo Motors
In the late 1990s, the leading South Korean car manufacturer, Daewoo Motors
(Daewoo), was in deep financial trouble. For the financial year ending 1999-2000,
Daewoo generated revenues of $197.8 million and net loss after tax of $10.43 billion.
The company's revenues had dropped by 94 percent since 1999. The loss was
regarded as South Korea's largest ever corporate loss. Apart from this, the company's
domestic market share came down to 23 percent in 2000 from 33 percent in 1998.
According to analysts, borrowings by the company for its expansion programs were
considered the reasons for the losses. By December 1999, the company's domestic
and foreign debt amounted to more than $16.06 billion. The entry into risky markets
and selling products at very low price in order to gain market share are the other
reasons that affected the company's financial condition. Even there was labour unrest,
which aggravated the problem. However, some analysts felt that the primary reason
for Daewoo's problems was mismanagement and the corrupt corporate governance
practices adopted by Kim Woo Choong (KIM), the founder of the Daewoo group. In
1999, Kim came up with a restructuring plan. He planned to sell about $7.5 billion
worth of assets of other companies of the group and concentrate on the automobiles
and finance business. Though the creditors appreciated the plan, it seemed difficult to
execute. Kim planned to sell Daewoo Group's shipyards to a Japanese company, but
Japan was planning to reduce its own shipyards by 50 percent. Kim also planned to
exchange the Group's electronics business for the Samsung Group's car division.
However, Samsung was not interested in buying the debt-ridden Daewoo electronics.
Since Kim was not able to execute his restructuring plan successfully, in July 1999,
the South Korean government declared Daewoo insolvent and put the company on
sale. In November 2000, the Korean Government officially announced Daewoo's
bankruptcy and its assets were put on sale. The government also set up a committee
for restructuring Daewoo. Around the same time when the company was about to be
announced bankrupt, General Motors (GM), Ford and Daimler-Chrysler expressed
interest in acquiring Daewoo. By June 2000, Ford entered into negotiations with the
committee. However, after a few months of negotiations, Ford reported that its due
diligence had revealed some discrepancies in Daewoo's valuation of its assets. In
September 2000, Ford announced the withdrawal of its offer, citing the discrepancies
in Daewoo's accounts as the primary reason. From August 2000, Daewoo stopped
paying its 19,000 employees since further loans were not sanctioned to the company.
Meanwhile, Daewoo employees opposed the sale of the company to a foreign
automaker. There were strikes at all Daewoo plants in Korea. One of the South
Korea's largest trade union groups, Korean Confederation of Trade Unions, also
protested the sell-off. There were also protests from a group of activists comprising
some high-profile members of the country. The group launched a campaign offering
to buy Daewoo and name it a 'people's company."
In October 2000, GM and its partners, including Isuzu Motors, Fuji Heavy Industries
and Suzuki Motors, announced their interest in acquiring a part of Daewoo's assets.
GM also insisted on the completion of the restructuring plan, which involved laying
off hundreds of workers at various Daewoo plants.
Amidst revolts and controversies, an agreement was reached between the Korean
government and GM in September 2001. GM signed a memorandum of
understanding with Daewoo's creditors to acquire two plants in Korea and one each in
Egypt and Vietnam, along with all their outstanding debts for $1.2 billion. The
agreement also included the acquisition of 22 sales units of the company across the
world. However, this agreement ran into problems when GM reported a discrepancy
in Daewoo's overseas accounts. In February 2002, GM made a renewed bid for some
of the Daewoo's assets to its main creditor KDB. In this bid, GM expressed interest in
only nine sales units of Daewoo as against the earlier 22. It also refused to pay the
$260 million debt of these units as it had discovered new debts in some of Daewoo's
overseas operations, including Daewoo's plant in Egypt.
In April 2002, GM and Daewoo's creditors arrived at an agreement. According to this
agreement, GM would create a new company which would be owned jointly by
Daewoo's creditors and GM. GM would own a 75 percent stake in the new company,
with an investment of $400 million. Creditors were to pay $137 million for the
remaining 33 percent stake.
According to analysts, GM's acquisition of Daewoo seemed to be the ideal solution
for the latter's problems. An analyst commented, "GM badly needs Daewoo to
establish a beachhead in the Asian market. And without GM, Daewoo will simply
collapse." They also opined that GM was the ideal buyer as it had owned a 50 percent
stake in Daewoo till 1992. Analysts felt that in the long run, GM could use Daewoo to
gain a foothold in Asia. Moreover, GM was facing problems in the US. Tough its
sales were more than those of Daimler-Chrysler and Ford, GM's net earning were
decreasing. Prior to the acquisition, GM depended solely on its European subsidiary
Ada Opel to manufacture small cars for developing countries. However, some
analysts felt that restoring Daewoo's brand image would require a lot of time and
money. Alan Perriton, who was in charge of GM's business development in Asia,
commented, "Daewoo's acquisition gives us high-quality, low-cost products for the
rest of Asia. However, sales have been hit so badly because Koreans weren't sure
Daewoo would survive. We have to let customers know that the company is back in
business and stand behind its products." However, some analysts felt that GM was
adding to its problems by acquiring a company like Daewoo.
Questions for Discussion
1. In 1999, Kim Woo Choong (KIM), the founder of the Daewoo group, came up
with a restructuring plan. He planned to sell about $7.5 billion worth of assets of
other companies of the group and concentrate on the automobiles and finance
business. Kim planned to sell Daewoo Group's shipyards to a Japanese company.
Kim also planned to exchange the Group's electronics business for Samsung
Group's car division. What could be the reasons behind Kim's decision to sell
Daewoo Group's shipyards and electronics?
2. GM had expressed interest in Daewoo at a time when most automobile
manufacturers had shown disinterest towards Daewoo. Explain why GM was
interested in Daewoo and how Daewoo will benefit after being acquired by GM?
Keywords
Brand image, corporate governance, trade union, acquisition, Daewoo group, Kim Woo Choong, KIM
Related Case Studies
| Case Title | Details |
|---|---|
|
Case Title Health Insurance, Cashless ‘Juggernaut’!Case Code: INS054 |
Details |
|
Case Title Demand Estimation for a Call CenterCase Code: OPER035 |
Details |
|
Case Title NIKE - Evolution of Marketing StrategyCase Code: MKTA018 |
Details |
|
Case Title Unilever in India - Building the Ice creams businessCase Code: MKTA004 |
Details |
|
Case Title The Global Car Industry in 2004Case Code: ECOA126 |
Details |