Abstract
The caselet looks into the impact of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in the US aviation industry in general and Southwest Airlines in particular. The ways in which Southwest airlines tried to mitigate the problems that the downturn in the industry had created forms part of the caselet. The caselet also delves into the role played by senior management to maintain the morale of the employees at the organization.
Learning Objectives
The case is structured to achieve the following Learning Objectives:
- The impact of September 11, 2001 crisis on the aviation industry
- The role of organization culture in increasing the efficiency of the company
- and The role of leadership in building trust among the employees
Contents
Culture and Strategy at Southwest Airlines
After the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, Southwest Airlines (Southwest) and
the entire airline industry in the US faced devastating losses. To reduce their losses,
airlines in the US cut the number of flights by 20% and laid off 16% of their
workforces in the weeks following the attacks. However, Southwest avoided layoffs
altogether and stuck to its mission of caring for its employees. It was felt that
avoiding layoffs in the face of a dramatic decline in demand would jeopardize
Southwest’s short-term prospects. However, Southwest was willing to suffer damage
even to its stock prices, to protect the jobs of its people. Southwest’s no-layoff
response to September 11 was a reminder to its employees of the organization’s
tradition of caring for its people.
Southwest has been profitable every year for 31 years since it started its operations in
1971. During this period most airlines have struggled to achieve three or four years of
consecutive profitability. Many analysts feel that the remarkable performance of
Southwest is because of its ability to build and sustain relationships characterized by
shared goals, shared knowledge and mutual respect between employees. All these
characteristics were ingrained in the organizational culture of Southwest.
Southwest’s objective was to provide safe, reliable and short duration air service at
the lowest possible fare. With an average aircraft trip of roughly 400 miles, or a little
over an hour in duration, the company had benchmarked its costs against ground
transportation. Southwest focused on short-haul flying, which was expensive because planes spent more time on the ground relative to the time spent in the air, thus
reducing aircraft productivity. Thus it was necessary for Southwest to have quick
turnarounds1 of aircraft to minimize the time its aircraft spend on the ground.
Southwest limited the turn time for each plane to ten minutes or less. It has managed
to limit airplanes’ turn time to (about 20-25 minutes) over the years.
A quick turnaround strategy was more relevant to Southwest than to its competitors
as it had a point-to-point flight between cities rather than a hub-and-spoke network2.
A hub-and-spoke system was characterized by longer wait time for both passengers
and airplanes, more planes, extra computer systems, extra salaries to ground staff and
additional commissions to travel agents. In addition, the airlines had to pay rent for
the gates, as the planes were kept idle at airports waiting for the connecting flights.
Recognizing these disadvantages, Southwest persisted with its point-to-point flights
between cities. There are many ways of being cost-effective such as cheap labor and
cheap equipment. But Southwest chose quicker turnaround of its aircrafts. Kelleher
had realized the importance of building confidence in his employees so as to get
things done faster. Kelleher also strove hard to make Southwest’s employees
understand the importance of ‘quickness’, a term he preferred to ‘speed’. He
explained that though quickness brought discomfort, “there can be security in
discomfort.”
Southwest’s organizational culture was shaped by Kelleher’s leadership. Kelleher’s
personality had a strong influence on the culture of Southwest, which epitomized his
spontaneity, energy and competitiveness. Southwest’s culture had three themes: love,
fun and efficiency. Kelleher treated all the employees as a “lovely and loving family”.
Southwest attempted to empower its employees to work on new ideas. When
Southwest employees came up with the idea of ticketless travel, they did not make a
formal presentation to senior executives. They just went ahead with the
implementation. Company sources stressed that Kelleher had never tried to single out
an employee for a mistake that had been inadvertently made. Southwest also laid
great emphasis on integrity. Integrity at Southwest meant sticking to promises and
actions. Southwest pilots entered into a 10-year long wage contract with the company because they probably believed in the integrity of persons on the other side of the
negotiating table. There were also differences in the degree of shared knowledge
between Southwest employees and employees of other airlines.
Southwest chose to grow very conservatively, expanding only into one or two cities
each year, so that it could devote the necessary time and attention to spread its unique
culture in each new city. Southwest used in-house newsletters, videos, annual reports
and cultural exchange meetings to diffuse its culture as the company grew big.
Southwest instituted a mechanism called the Culture Committee in 1990 for the sole
purpose of reinforcing the spirit of Southwest.
Questions for Discussion
1. Southwest demonstrated tremendous commitment towards its employees. Explain
how Southwest demonstrated this commitment towards its employees?
2. Southwest’s objective was to provide safe, reliable and short duration air service
at the lowest possible fare. Describe briefly, how it met its objective?
Keywords
Southwest Airlines, September, 11, 2001 crisis, layoffs, culture, Herbert D. Kelleher, hub-and-spoke, point-to-point