| Kmart: Fall of a Retailing Giant |  | ICMR HOME | Case Studies CollectionOR
 Case Details:
 
 Case Code : BSTR056
 Case Length : 16 Pages
 Period : 2000 - 2003
 Organization : Kmart
 Pub Date : 2003
 Teaching Note :Not Available
 Countries : USA
 Retail ing
 
 To download Kmart: Fall of a Retailing Giant case study (Case Code: BSTR056) click on the button  below, and select the case from the list of available cases:
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
| 
 Buy With PayPal
 |  
 Price:
 
 For delivery in electronic format: Rs. 500;
 For delivery through courier (within India): Rs. 500 + Shipping & Handling Charges extra
 
 
 
 » 
Business Strategy Case Studies» Business Strategy Short Case Studies
 » View Detailed Pricing Info
 » How To Order This Case
 » Business Case Studies
 » Area Specific Case Studies
 » Industry Wise Case Studies
 » Company Wise Case Studies
   
 Please note:
 
 This case study was compiled from published sources, and is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion. It is not intended to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management situation. Nor is it a primary information source.
 
 
 
 Chat with us
 
 
  
 Please leave your feedback
 
 
   | 
		
			| 
<< Previous
 EXCERPTSKmart Under ConawayIn May 2000, Conaway replaced Floyd as the CEO of Kmart - and things were never the same again. In addition to Wal-Mart, the company was struggling hard to compete with another discount retailer Target. 
	
		| 
Competition from these two companies led to a fall in Kmart's market share (Refer Table I) and financial performance (for 2000, Kmart posted a loss of $ 244 million). Kmart had become infamous for not keeping its stores clean and for not stocking enough goods. Customers had to wait in long queues for shopping at its stores. Even Martha complained of distribution problems and the difficulty customers had locating her products. For such customers, she said, "If you are frustrated, keep looking." Conaway identified the following as Kmart's major problems: poor inventory management (resulting in empty store shelves); lack of customer focus; and a poor, undifferentiated marketing strategy...  |  
 |  Towards BankruptcyUnder the above circumstances, Conaway's and Schwartz's (who joined in September 2002) 'obsession' to beat Wal-Mart and Target was untimely. Conaway and Schwartz wanted to leave no stone unturned in their quest to beat the competition.  
	
		|  | In 2001, while Kmart posted a loss of $ 1.3 billion on sales of $ 36 billion, Wal-Mart posted a profit of $ 6.7 billion on sales of $ 217 billion (Refer Exhibit III for a brief note on the industry environment for these companies). In fiscal 2001-02, Kmart reduced its prices significantly, hoping to beat Wal-Mart and Target. Under this initiative, named the BlueLight Always campaign, the company planned to sell over 50,000 items at everyday low prices. Reportedly, the directors of the company including Adamson expressed their displeasure with regard to the BlueLight Always program. In fact, Adamson recommended a trial-run of the program. However, Conaway went ahead with a full-fledged implementation of the program...  |  
Excerpts Contd... >> 
 |  |