A Note On The Financial Evaluation Of Projects
<<Previous
FINANCIAL EVALUATIONThe financial evaluation of
a commercial project mainly involves estimating the return on investment and
the profitability of the project. However, the financial evaluation of
non-commercial projects involve the identification of the most efficient way
of delivering the desired project outputs and ensuring that the project
outputs result in significant benefits to the community.
Financial appraisal includes the compilation of the list of alternative
projects and the associated streams of costs and benefits. The financial
evaluation is conducted using the cash flow rather than accounting profits
method[2]. The accuracy of the evaluation will ultimately depend on:
•The quality of the estimates on which the cash flows
are based
•The identification of all relevant cash flows and
•The exclusion of all non-cash items.
FACTORS FOR MEASURING PROJECT CASH FLOWS
When calculating the financial costs and project cash flows, the
following factors must be kept in mind – incremental analysis, sunk
costs, accrual accounting and cash flows, incidental effects and
opportunity costs. |
|
INCREMENTAL ANALYSIS
According to this principle, the cash flows have to be
measured in incremental terms. Only those revenues or expenditures that are
likely to occur as a direct result of the project should be included when
determining the cash flows. A project's incremental cash flows should be
ascertained through the ‘with and without[3]'principle, i.e. to determine the cash
flows of the firm including and excluding the project.
Project Cash Flow Cash flow for the firm Cash flow for the firm
for year (T) = with the project for year (T) without the project for the year
(T)
The idea behind the incremental analysis concept is to illustrate only the
additional impact created by a project. Cash flows that would have occurred
irrespective of the project are extraneous to the analysis and should be
excluded.
Example
If a department currently owns a vehicle fleet and is considering selling it and
leasing vehicles instead, the incremental costs and benefits of doing so can be
compared. If the net present value of the proposal is positive, then the
proposal should be accepted. If the current situation is being compared with
more than one alternative, the proposals can be ranked by dividing the net
present value by the initial investment. The proposal which should be accepted
is that with the highest ratio of net present value to Investment.
SUNK COSTS
Sunk costs refer to non-recoverable costs incurred in the past or committed
before the evaluation of a project. These costs have to be ignored when
conducting a financial evaluation of a project.
Example
Firm A has hired a consultant to assess the viability of outsourcing its credit
collections and to list the possible agencies to which it can outsource its
collections. Firm A spent $121,000 on consultant's fees prior to the evaluation
of proposals. It further estimated that other costs like legal fees, stamp duty
etc. for setting up an outsourcing contract would be $240,500 and the present
value of cost savings from outsourcing will be $320,450. On the basis of the
available information, the management of the company argued that since it had
already incurred $121,000 for assessing the viability of the project, it would
be a waste not to proceed with outsourcing, while the staff argued that the firm
should not proceed further because the project would never recover the initial
outlay of $121,000. In this case, both the arguments are invalid, as $121,000 is
the sunk cost and thus irrelevant for calculating the project costs. The
outsourcing project will have an NPV of $79,950 ($320,450 – $240,500).
More...
CASH FLOWS FROM LONG TERM FUNDS POINT OF VIEW
CASH FLOWS FROM EQUITY FUNDS POINT OF VIEW
CASH FLOWS FROM TOTAL FUNDS POINT OF VIEW
CHOICE OF DISCOUNT RATE
APPRAISAL CRITERIA
DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW/TIME ADJUSTED TECHNIQUES
NET PRESENT VALUE
APPRAISAL TECHNIQUES IN PRACTICE FOR VARIOUS TYPES OF PROJECTS
CONCLUSION
EXHIBIT I ASPECTS OF PROJECT APPRAISAL
EXHIBIT II PROJECT EVALUATION TECHNIQUES
[2] The accounting profit
method ignores the time value of money. Under this method, revenue is
recognized as being generated when the product is sold and not when cash is
collected from the sale of the product.
[3] A common mistake is to select cash flows on a ‘before and after'basis
(the ‘after'cash flows incorporate the effects of the project and other
unrelated initiatives).
2010, ICMR (IBS Center for Management Research).All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be
reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, used in a spreadsheet, or transmitted
in any form or by any means - electronic or mechanical, without permission.
To order copies, call +91- 8417- 236667 or write to ICMR,
Survey No. 156/157, Dontanapalli Village, Shankerpalli Mandal,
Ranga Reddy District,
Hyderabad-501504.
Andhra Pradesh, INDIA.
Mob: +91- 9640901313, Ph: +91- 8417- 236667,
Fax: +91- 8417- 236668
E-mail: info@icmrindia.org
Website: www.icmrindia.org
|