BRANDED GOLD JEWELLERY MARKET IN INDIA
Case code- BSTR-041
Published-2002
GOLD JEWELLERY MARKET IN INDIA
GOLD JEWELLERY BECOMES FASHION ACCESSORY
Continued from page 2
STRATEGIES FOR WOOING CUSTOMERS
TANISHQ
In the late 1990s, players in the branded gold jewellery market formulated
strategies for wooing customers. According to Jacob Kurian (Kurian), Chief
Operating Officer of Tanishq, the challenges were many. As the jewellery market
was highly fragmented, lacked branding, and allowed many unethical practices to
flourish, Tanishq worked hard on a two-pronged brand-building strategy:
cultivate trust by educating customers about the unethical practices in the
business and change the perception of jewellery as a high-priced purchase. Said
Kurian, "We are changing the attitudes of customers from blind trust to
informed trust."
To increase its marketshare, Tanishq formulated a
strategy for luring people away from traditional neighborhood jewellers.
Tanishq's strategy was to create differentiation and build trust.
According to Kurian, the first part of the strategy was "to provide a
point of differentiation in a highly commoditized category - which is the
whole point of branding." The second part of the strategy was to project
Tanishq as an unimpeachable mark of trust. According to Kurian, "If
differentiation plays the role of primary attraction, trust takes care of
lifelong loyalty."
One way to create differentiation was through design. The emphasis had to
be on design because local jewellers could offer to design any pattern
according to the customer's specifications. For a national brand a generic
design concept with regional variations had to be evolved. (Refer Exhibit
I for Tanishq's design). For this, Tanishq set up a seven member in-house
design team and also outsourced designs from freelance designers. |
|
The designers travelled the length and breadth of the country to get feedback
on Tanishq's designs and learn about customer preferences. On the basis of
this feedback, each showroom could select the designs it would carry. To stay ahead of competition from local jewellers, Tanishq
decided to focus on quality control. In 1999, it introduced caratmeters which
showed the purity of gold. In fact, Tanishq's USP was the purity of its gold.
Accordingly, the company's ad campaigns emphasised the purity aspect of all
Tanishq ornaments. (Refer Exhibit II for Tanishq's Ad Campaign)
In November 2002, Tanishq introduced a new collection of jewellery called
'Lightweights.' The collection featured neckwear, earrings, bangles, rings and
chains in 22 karat gold with prices starting at Rs 1,100. It also launched
Lightweight Diamonds, with prices starting at Rs 3,000.
Tanishq focused not only on urban markets, but small town markets as well. Real
estate was less expensive in the small towns than in large urban centres.
Besides, competition from stores in small towns was less stiff than competition
from the large jewellery stores in the metropolitan cities. According to Kurian,
the best returns on investment came from small towns.
CARBON
Carbon's focus had always been to move jewellery from the vault to the dressing
table and bring the selling of jewellery out of heavily guarded jewellery
stores. This was achieved by persuading a few lifestyle stores to add branded
jewellery to their vast array of products. Besides selling from lifestyle
stores, Carbon also sold its products as gift items over the internet.
Like Tanishq, Carbon laid emphasis on design. Most of its designs were
contributed by students at the National Institute of Fashion Technology (NIFT)
through the diploma programme which the company sponsored. In addition,
Peakok's team of six designers, (headed by Rajeswari Iyer, an alumnus of a
German design school who had worked in the U.K., Germany and India) turned out
around 180 to 200 styles in a year, with 75 designs per style. At any point in
time, there were around 600 designs of Carbon on sale, and on an average, 300
to 400 pieces per design were sold. In 2002, Carbon launched its 'Sun Sign'
collection, which was based on the symbols of the Zodiac. This collection was a
set of 12 pendants designed in a blend of 18 carat white and yellow gold (Refer
Exhibit III).
While 18 carat gold was commonly used in Carbon products, some of the designs
also used white gold, titanium and steel. Diamond was the preferred precious
stone, but other colored stones were also used. Comprising items of everyday
use, (rings, chains, bracelets, ear studs, tie-pins and cuff links) Carbon
items were an impulse purchases. (Refer Exhibit IV) The brand had no offtake
cycles in the year, like the marriage season, unlike traditional jewellery. The
creation, manufacture and marketing of Carbon was different from the making and
selling of traditional jewellery. Said Rao, "We are attempting here to
eliminate the low productivity, quality inconsistencies and high precious metal
loss associated with traditional jewellery making. We have instituted modern
manufacturing practices such as self- contained small groups in the assembly
area, self-inspection by the operators, the Japanese Kaizen approach to
improvements in operational practices and the like. We have brought down our
manufacturing loss of gold to 6.8 per cent. The average in the traditional
Indian jewellery shop is as high as 22 per cent, while the world average is
only 2 per cent."
As the profile of the average customer likely to purchase a Carbon item was a
well-paid urban professional, 24 to 38 years old, having a credit card, it was
decided that Carbon should not be placed in the usual jewellery shops but made
available at `shop-in-shop' outlets in large lifestyle stores (such as Shoppers
Stop, Ebony, Globus, The Bombay Store, Lifestyle and Taj Khazana) and some
premium boutiques (such as the Helvetica in Chennai). Said Rao, "We are looking
at cross-promoting Carbon jewellery with other branded lifestyle products such
as perfumes, clothing and cosmetics." Carbon products were priced between Rs.
2,750 and Rs. 20,000 per piece. While the cost of traditional jewellery was
negotiable, the cost of Carbon items was fixed and nationally uniform.
STRATEGIES FOR WOOING CUSTOMERS - Oyzterbay, Gili, and Trendsmith
ALL THAT GLITTERS IS NOT GOLD
2010, ICMR (IBS Center for Management Research).All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be
reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, used in a spreadsheet, or transmitted
in any form or by any means - electronic or mechanical, without permission.
To order copies, call +91- 8417- 236667 or write to ICMR,
Survey No. 156/157, Dontanapalli Village, Shankerpalli Mandal,
Ranga Reddy District,
Hyderabad-501504.
Andhra Pradesh, INDIA.
Mob: +91- 9640901313, Ph: +91- 8417- 236667,
Fax: +91- 8417- 236668
E-mail: info@icmrindia.org
Website: www.icmrindia.org
This case study is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion rather
than to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management
situation. This case was compiled from published sources.
|