Case Studies and Management Resources
 Asia's Most Popular Collection of Management Case Studies

Case Studies | Case Study in Business, Management, Operations, Strategy, Case Studies

Quick Search


www ICMR


Search

 

TISCO - THE WORLD'S MOST COST-EFFECTIVE STEEL PLANT

            

ICMR India ICMR India ICMR India ICMR India RSS Feed

BACKGROUND NOTE

IMPLEMENTING BEST PRACTICES

 continued from page 2

THE FUTURE

Analysts felt that TISCO's modernization program was very successful. The Steel Authority of India Ltd. (SAIL) adopted a similar program with an investment of Rs 70 billion. However, the program was not successful. In contrast, in spite of the depressed market and lower margins, the decrease in the production costs enabled TISCO to achieve a profit after tax of Rs 5.53 billion in 2000-2001, and Rs 4.22 billion in 1999-2000 compared to Rs 2.82 billion during 1998-99.

TISCO planned to enter new areas including setting up of a 0.1 million-ton ferro chrome export oriented project. The project was planned in Australia because of the lower power costs. TISCO was to get power at a tariff of 1.8 cents for about 15 years that is about one-fifth of the tariffs in India. Power accounted for 60% of the cost of ferro chrome manufacturing. TISCO was also planning to enter titanium mining through alliances with major global companies. To provide employment to the employees opting for VRS at over-manned units, TISCO planned to enter the call center business in Jamshedpur. To develop this business, TISCO entered into a marketing alliance with Tata International, the trading arm of Tata Group. TISCO also planned to exit from some of its non-core activities.

Critics felt that TISCO might face problems due to the decrease in demand for steel in the global and local markets and increasing competition from cheap imports, and anti-dumping duties imposed on the domestic steel manufacturers by the US. They felt that it was doubtful whether steel, even at the lowest cost, would deliver returns higher than the cost of capital in India.

However, some analysts remarked that in the long run, TISCO's strategy to export to Jordan, Iraq and the Southeast Asian countries might reduce dependence on the US markets thus helping the company. They said that its entry into value-added products was expected to safeguard the company from the fluctuations in the steel prices.


QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION

1. TOP was described as "maximum impact to the bottomline, with minimum investment, in the minimum time. What was the rationale behind the implementation of TOP? Briefly analyze the process and explain the advantages of TOP.

2. The cost-cutting measures seemed to have helped TISCO to a large extent. Apart from TOP, what are the other steps taken by TISCO for reducing costs?

3. The lowered production costs enabled TISCO to record a profit during 1999-2000,despite a depressed market and low margins. Do you think the low costs would help the company in the long run? Justify your answer.

ADDITIONAL READINGS & REFERENCES

1. Seno A Alexandra, Indian Steel's False Start, www.asiaweek.com, May 15, 1998.
2. Anmol Singh Archana, Steel Industry: TISCO, IUP,November,1998.
3. Dutta Anirudha, TOP at TISCO: TISCO's quest to become globally competitive,www.indiainfoline.com, September 13, 1999.
4. McKinsey and Booz-Allen to chart out course for Tata Steel's cost-cutting plan,Financial Express, October 29, 1999.
5. India firm is world's top steel producer, www.globalsources.com, August 8, 2001.
6. Metre Anil, Quest for Modernisation, Advertising & Marketing, September 15, 2001.
7. SAP helps TISCO become globally competitive steel maker,www.expresscomputeronline.com, November 26, 2001.
8. www.karvy.com
9. www.tata.com
10www.tatasteel.com


2003, ICMR (IBS Center for Management Research).All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, used in a spreadsheet, or transmitted in any form or by any means - electronic or mechanical, without permission.

To order copies, call +91- 8417- 236667 or write to ICMR,
Survey No. 156/157, Dontanapalli Village, Shankerpalli Mandal,
Ranga Reddy District,
Hyderabad-501504. Andhra Pradesh, INDIA. Ph: +91- 8417- 236667,
Fax: +91- 8417- 236668
E-mail: info@icmrindia.org
Website: www.icmrindia.org

This case study is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion rather than to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management situation. This case was compiled from published sources.
     


ICMRINDIA © 2010 ICMR (IBS Center for Management Research).
All rights reserved.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | FAQ