|  | 
 Fairness Wars
	<<Previous        THE WARS CONTINUE UNABATEDIn early 2001, three major players – HLL, CavinKare and 
Godrej – competed fiercely to penetrate the market further with their attractive 
schemes. A growing number of pharma and OTC drug companies like Emami, Ayurvedic 
Concepts, Paras etc. also entered this segment. Companies were also facing 
competition from Amway, Avon, Modicare etc., which were into direct selling. The 
market was seeing a major convergence of product categories with the emergence 
of more and more variants to fill every conceivable niche. 
 This heightened competition forced companies to increase their advertisement 
spends. HLL re-launched F&L and quadrupled its advertising expenditure. 
CavinKare more than doubled its ad spends from Rs.215 million in 1999 to Rs.500 
million in 2001. Godrej and Emami too planned to raise their ad spends. But even 
as ad spends increased, fakes entered the market. Fair & Lovely's fakes were 
rampant with names like Pure & Lovely and Fare & Lovely. Fairever's copies were 
Four Ever, For Ever or Fare Ever.
 
 In early 2001, HLL launched Nutririch Fair & Lovely Fairness Reviving Lotion to 
protect its brand from any threat in the premium segment. The new product was 
claimed to be scientifically formulated to protect the skin from harmful 
ultraviolet rays and enhance natural fairness. The new formula, containing 
Triple UV Guard Sun protection system and the fairness ingredients Vitamin B3 
and milk proteins, promised to restore and protect the natural skin colours from 
the sun's darkening effects. The product was also claimed to contain Niacinamide 
making it the only patented formula fairness cream. It was targeted at women in 
the age group of 18-35 and was priced at a premium. A 50ml pack was priced at 
Rs.38 and a 100ml pack at Rs.68. HLL also launched ‘Pears Naturals Fairness 
cream'at the same time.
 
 By mid 2001, the fairness concept was no longer restricted to creams and soaps, 
but had expanded to talcs also. Emami was test marketing a herbal fairness talc 
in the South. The rapid expansion of the fairness business had two consequences: 
cutthroat competition and a flurry of copycats. Every company - from the market 
leader to the new entrants – was forced to rethink its marketing strategies, 
spend lavishly on advertisements, and even seek legal action against unfair 
claims.
 
 
	
		
			|  | 
	Continued....
 |  
			|  |  | 
 |  | 
2001,  ICMR (IBS Center for Management Research).All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be 
reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, used in a spreadsheet, or transmitted 
in any form or by any means - electronic or mechanical, without permission. 
 To order copies, call +91- 8417- 236667 or write to ICMR,
 Survey No. 156/157, Dontanapalli Village, Shankerpalli Mandal,
 Ranga Reddy District,
 Hyderabad-501504.
Andhra Pradesh, INDIA.
Mob: +91- 9640901313, Ph: +91- 8417- 236667,
 Fax: +91- 8417- 236668
 E-mail: info@icmrindia.org
 Website: www.icmrindia.org
 |  ICMRINDIA © 2010 ICMR (IBS Center for Management Research).All rights reserved.
 Terms of Use | 
Privacy Policy
 
 |