Case Studies and Management Resources
 Asia's Most Popular Collection of Management Case Studies

Case Studies | Case Study in Business, Management, Operations, Strategy, Case Studies

Quick Search


www ICMR


Search

 

The Coimbatore Bypass Road Project

            

ICMR India ICMR India ICMR India ICMR India RSS Feed

<<Previous

CHALLENGES

L&T faced problems with the tolling of the old Athupalam bridge, which did not come within the route of the bypass. This bridge was an already existing facility being used by the incoming traffic from Kerala to Tamilnadu. Transport operators had initially refused to pay the tolls. The bulk users of the bridge including the state transport corporations of Tamilnadu and Kerala had refused to pay the tolls.

The Tamilnadu state government too backtracked and sought concessional tariff for state transport buses on the plea that the transport department was in the red. The Tamilnadu government was willing to pay only Rs.50 per bus for making more than three trips a day instead of the originally planned Rs.15 per bus per trip. L&T agreed to the subsidized toll rate on the condition that the state government compensated the revenue losses sustained by the company[9].

The Coimbatore District Bus Owners Association (CDBOA) and the Lorry Owners Association refused to pay even the subsidized tariff. The CDBOA had even taken the issue to Madras[10] High Court against the tariff but the Court directed the private operators to pay the toll charges. However, they refused to comply with the court's orders.

Since December 1998, L&T was unable to collect the tolls from road users and this resulted in a loss of Rs.74.1 mn as of June 2000. This included Rs.11.4 mn due from the Tamilnadu government towards reimbursement of losses incurred out of the subsidized toll payment for the state transport buses.

N R Naramsimhan, GM (developmental projects)- L&T felt that unless the state government gave L&T powers to deal strictly with the non-payers, it would be impossible to recover the investment. He felt L&T might even request the state government to take over the project. L&T contemplated on invoking the force majeure clause[11] and pulling out of the project. L&T was also under tremendous pressure from the financial institutions, which had lent money, to create additional securities. MoST had asked the state government to take a quick decision as a delay would have an adverse impact on other BOT projects in the state.

QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION

ADDITIONAL READINGS AND REFERENCES

[9] About 230 buses made a minimum of 2,180 trips a day. L&T claimed that it would sustain a loss of Rs.20,000 per day on government vehicles alone.

[10] Madras (renamed Chennai) is the capital of Tamil Nadu.

[11] Force majeure is an event or accident beyond any person's control. It includes natural disasters (or acts of God), mass acts of human agency, such as war and civil strife.


2010, ICMR (IBS Center for Management Research).All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, used in a spreadsheet, or transmitted in any form or by any means - electronic or mechanical, without permission.

To order copies, call +91- 8417- 236667 or write to ICMR,
Survey No. 156/157, Dontanapalli Village, Shankerpalli Mandal,
Ranga Reddy District,
Hyderabad-501504. Andhra Pradesh, INDIA. Ph: +91- 8417- 236667,
Fax: +91- 8417- 236668
E-mail: info@icmrindia.org
Website: www.icmrindia.org

 


ICMRINDIA © 2010 ICMR (IBS Center for Management Research).
All rights reserved.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | FAQ