Titan - The Outsourcing Journey
<<Previous
OUTSOURCING AT TITAN contd...
This loss was due to the high overheads, excise duties and marketing
spending in 1999-00, which increased expenditure by Rs 1.5 billion.
Moreover, net profits had come down by 47% to Rs 146.4 million in 1998 from
Rs 275.7 million in 1996 (Refer Table V). Company watchers partly attributed
this to the heavy investments in the manufacturing setup.
TABLE V
TITAN - KEY STATISTICS (in Rs million)
|
94-95
|
95-96
|
96-97
|
97-98
|
98-99
|
1999-00
|
2000-01
|
Sales Volumes (nos. in lakhs) |
Watches
|
325.8
|
387.5
|
394.5
|
435.3
|
511.1
|
585.4
|
667.6
|
Jewellery
|
0.9
|
2
|
3.7
|
12
|
16.8
|
30
|
72.1
|
Table Clocks
|
-
|
6.7
|
36.4
|
30.5
|
43
|
32.9
|
16.2
|
Sales Income
|
2824.9
|
3507.2
|
4085.2
|
4420.6
|
4820.4
|
6303.3
|
6969
|
Expenditure
|
2239.3
|
2761.9
|
3207.3
|
3572
|
3934.8
|
5506.2
|
6141.9
|
Interest
|
218
|
342.2
|
564
|
529.6
|
519.2
|
508.8
|
478.4
|
Depreciation
|
131.1
|
156.8
|
165.2
|
188.2
|
201.4
|
204
|
209.3
|
Operating Profit
|
236.5
|
246.3
|
148.7
|
130.8
|
165
|
84.3
|
139.4
|
Other Income
|
14.4
|
29.4
|
129.3
|
31.6
|
24.1
|
130.1
|
116.3
|
Profit Before Taxes
|
250.9
|
275.7
|
278
|
162.4
|
189.1
|
214.4
|
255.7
|
Taxes
|
-
|
-
|
35.8
|
16
|
18.7
|
21.6
|
20.9
|
Profit After Taxes
|
250.9
|
275.7
|
242.2
|
146.4
|
170.4
|
192.8
|
234.8
|
Equity Div. (%)
|
30%
|
33%
|
33%
|
25%
|
26%
|
26%
|
26%
|
Source: www.titanworld.com
Taking into account the above factors, Titan had no
other option but to settle for outsourcing. Around the same time, Titan
decided to change its focus to generating more volumes rather than value.
This was because the growth in the premium segment of the watch market,
which was Titan's mainstay, had been below its expectations. The company
wanted to build up a base in the lower value segment and extend its reach.
According to company estimates, outsourcing worked out be around 30% cheaper
than manufacturing in-house.
Another reason why Titan wanted to reduce its focus on manufacturing was the
high employee costs – 11.2% of its revenues in 2000. This was because in the
days when the company had no other option but to manufacture, the Hosur
factory had a huge worker base. In 1997 and 2000, the company entered into
various wage agreements with the workers'union. As a result, even a
low-skilled blue-collar worker at the company earned as much as Rs 10,000
per month. This increased overall employee costs. According to analysts,
this was alarming because since 1996, Titan had neither made any fresh
recruitments nor replaced close to 200 supervisory and managerial-level
employees who left in the same period.
However, the biggest factor that swung the decision in favor of outsourcing
was the fact that Titan was not being able to meet the onslaught of the
unorganized sector for the first time. Since the company decided to focus on
generating volumes from low-end mass products, it had come in direct
competition with players in the unorganized market. With cheaper Chinese
imports flooding the Indian market, Titan realized that the complete
technology of making watches, from hand-plating technology to manufacturing
cases, was easily available at prices much lower than what the Hosur factory
could ever deliver. According to a former company manager, “The extra costs
in the system aren't helping in differentiating the brand. Today, even
unique elements of design are being easily copied at a lower cost.”
THE FUTURE
EXHIBIT I - TITAN - PRODUCT PROFILE
2005, Case Studies and Management Resources. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be
reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, used in a spreadsheet, or transmitted
in any form or by any means - electronic or mechanical, without permission.
To order copies, call +91- 8417- 236667or write to Case Studies and Management Resources, Survey No. 156/157, Dontanapalli Village, Shankerpalli Mandal,
Ranga Reddy District,
Hyderabad-501504.
Andhra Pradesh, INDIA.or
email info@icmrindia.org. Website: www.icmrindia.org
|