Case Studies and Management Resources
 Asia's Most Popular Collection of Management Case Studies

Case Studies | Case Study in Business, Management, Operations, Strategy, Case Studies

Quick Search


www ICMR


Search

 

Banning Liquor Surrogate Advertising

            

ICMR India ICMR India ICMR India ICMR India RSS Feed

<<Previous

ABOUT SURROGATE BRANDS Contd..

The number and range of surrogate advertisements increased as liquor producers started sponsoring movies, music shows, and other programs attracting youth. For instance, Seagram's Royal Stag was promoted by sponsoring movie-related activities and Indian pop music under the banners Royal Stag Mega Movies and Royal Stag Mega Music. It promoted its 100 Pipers brand by sponsoring a series of performances by fusion music artists under the name 100 Pipers Pure Music. Blenders'Pride sponsored a series of performances by troop dancers and artists under the banner of Blenders'Pride Magical Nites. Seagram also sponsored events such as the Chivas Regal Polo Championships and the Chivas Regal Invitational Golf Challenge for corporates.

In late 2001, television broadcasters began airing socially responsible advertisements sponsored by liquor companies, even though the government had not issued any notification permitting the airing of socially responsible ads on TV. Star TV and Sony were among the leading broadcasters telecasting such advertisements included STAR TV and Sony. The advertisements were telecast during Christmas and New Year's Eve. One of these ads by Seagram wished the viewers with ‘Season's Greetings.'

Another advertisement of Seagram read, “Tonight, when it's one for the road, it's got to be coffee.” L.S.Nayak, Vice President (Sales and Marketing), STAR TV said, “It's not a liquor advertisement at all. It's just another corporate advertisement through a social message. It cannot be classified as a liquor advertisement because Seagram is not a liquor brand. One must see the spirit behind an advertisement to find out whether it's promoting liquor or not.”

Some of the broadcasters said that because the I&B Ministry was taking a long time deciding about the use of socially responsible advertisements by liquor companies, they had started using them without the Ministry's consent. IBF's Executive Director, Bhuvan Lal, reportedly argued that there was nothing wrong with airing such advertisements because they did not violate the government's guidelines restricting the telecast of direct/indirect liquor ads. The government's guidelines stated that ‘advertisements which lead to sale, consumption and promotion of liquor should not be allowed.'According to Bhuvan Lal, these advertisements were perfectly legal as they did not lead to sale, consumption and promotion of liquor.

Soon, liquor companies that had not entered into any agreements with satellite channels for airing socially responsible and for surrogate advertisements started processing such agreements. For instance, Whyte & Mackay began negotiating agreements with various TV channels, including Star TV. Amar Sinha, CEO, Whyte & Mackay, said, “As long as there was no ban, companies were not interested in showing liquor advertisements in the garb of social messages. But with the government imposing restrictions, social messages are a route to liquor advertising for many.”

By early 2002, there were many surrogate advertisements of liquor brands on satellite TV channels. These advertisements attracted a lot of criticism. According to an analyst[7], “We see a brown liquid poured into a glass under a well-known brand name, and we are told the man is drinking apple juice! The girl who is avidly watching him immediately rewards him with a kiss. In the same sort of way, water, soda and other harmless liquors stand in for hard liquor and beat the ban.” (Refer Exhibit IV and V for sample surrogate advertisements). There were numerous other advertisements selling music cassettes, CDs, water, clothing, fashion accessories and sports goods – many of them accused of being sexually provocative and offensive.


More...

THE DEBATE

TABLE II AD SPENDS OF LEADING INDIAN LIQUOR COMPANIES

WHAT LIES AHEAD?

QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION:

EXHIBIT I SALES OF WINES, SPIRITS & LIQUOR COMPANIES

EXHIBIT II SALES OF BEER COMPANIES

EXHIBIT III CABLE TV ACT 1995: 2000 AMENDMENTS RELATED TO LIQUOR ADS

ADDITIONAL READINGS & REFERENCES:

[7] Amita Mallik, www.tribuneindia.com


2010, ICMR (IBS Center for Management Research).All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, used in a spreadsheet, or transmitted in any form or by any means - electronic or mechanical, without permission.

To order copies, call +91- 8417- 236667 or write to ICMR,
Survey No. 156/157, Dontanapalli Village, Shankerpalli Mandal,
Ranga Reddy District,
Hyderabad-501504. Andhra Pradesh, INDIA. Mob: +91- 9640901313, Ph: +91- 8417- 236667,
Fax: +91- 8417- 236668
E-mail: info@icmrindia.org
Website: www.icmrindia.org


ICMRINDIA © 2010 ICMR (IBS Center for Management Research).
All rights reserved.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | FAQ